FEP contact area versus model thickness to avoid breakage
Posted: October 16th, 2022, 5:40 pm
There seems to be lots of on-line advice on reducing sticking to the FEP film, and to avoid the model separating from the build plate, but there must also be a danger of the model breaking in the middle if it is too skinny (small in cross section) comparted to the FEP contact area which resists lifting. As a new user of these printers I am surprised how much the FEP film is gripped, and indeed my first model was pulled off the build plate due to contact area there being too small. But I fixed that by widening the initial build surface.
Is there some sort of ratio of FEP contact to model cross section that can lead to breaking in the middle? I am particularly thinking of making window frames (about 25 x 40 mm and 5mm square in cross section). The frame could be formed flat against the build plate but that limits the number to made together. But if they hang vertically from the build plate, when the bottom horizontal member is being formed there will be a large FEP contact area but a small cross section of the two vertical members. If this is likely to cause a break then remedies could include addition vertical rafts between the top and bottom members or forming it on an angle so there is never a whole length of a straight member being formed at once. Although in that case extra support rafts would be needed at the top, and the FEP pull would tend to distort the rectangle.
Is there some sort of ratio of FEP contact to model cross section that can lead to breaking in the middle? I am particularly thinking of making window frames (about 25 x 40 mm and 5mm square in cross section). The frame could be formed flat against the build plate but that limits the number to made together. But if they hang vertically from the build plate, when the bottom horizontal member is being formed there will be a large FEP contact area but a small cross section of the two vertical members. If this is likely to cause a break then remedies could include addition vertical rafts between the top and bottom members or forming it on an angle so there is never a whole length of a straight member being formed at once. Although in that case extra support rafts would be needed at the top, and the FEP pull would tend to distort the rectangle.