Marlin manual Bed leveling Leveling increment tweaking

Software and Firmware Discussion - related to source code, firmware updates, etc.
Post Reply
pochrist
Reactions:
Posts: 2
Joined: February 24th, 2020, 10:53 am
3D Printer(s): Maker Farm Pegasus 8 & 12

Marlin manual Bed leveling Leveling increment tweaking

Post by pochrist » February 24th, 2020, 11:05 am

Using a Makerfarm Pegasus 8 which in turn is Using Marlin Firmware 1.x, trying to improve my accuracy and was wondering if there is a way to tweak my setting for the manual leveling process.



When performing a manual bed level, when i turn the knob the x carriage moves up or down at .5mm increments (I think) is there anyway i can lower the number to .25mm or .1mm.



Perhaps I'm being anal, but I like to be as close to possible when running the process.

Thanks

User avatar
Roberts_Clif
Reactions:
Posts: 960
Joined: March 25th, 2017, 8:17 am
Location: Washington
3D Printer(s): Hictop 3DP11/12

Re: Marlin manual Bed leveling Leveling increment tweaking

Post by Roberts_Clif » February 24th, 2020, 1:37 pm

Are you looking for
#define MBL_Z_STEP 0.025 // Step size while manually probing Z axis.
Electronics Technician / Computer Programmer

pochrist
Reactions:
Posts: 2
Joined: February 24th, 2020, 10:53 am
3D Printer(s): Maker Farm Pegasus 8 & 12

Re: Marlin manual Bed leveling Leveling increment tweaking

Post by pochrist » February 24th, 2020, 2:40 pm

Perhaps, is this line already in the Marlin Config.h or am I adding it? Conversely is there a way to do it via Pronterface and gcode commands?

User avatar
Roberts_Clif
Reactions:
Posts: 960
Joined: March 25th, 2017, 8:17 am
Location: Washington
3D Printer(s): Hictop 3DP11/12

Re: Marlin manual Bed leveling Leveling increment tweaking

Post by Roberts_Clif » February 24th, 2020, 4:29 pm

I found it in all versions of marlin 1.1.x that I have programmed for My 3D Printers.

I do not know of a way maybe, someone else will know.
Electronics Technician / Computer Programmer

Post Reply

Return to “Software and Firmware Discussion”