Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
- Titus
- Reactions:
- Posts: 252
- Joined: February 9th, 2016, 10:20 pm
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker Original+HBK
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Yeah, I can look down the nozzle and see the light
- Neotko
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: February 7th, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Location: Madrid
- 3D Printer(s): UMO+ x2.5
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
New test looks very very very nice
70mm/s 210C olsson nozzle 0.1 layer (same gcode as the first post video)
Using my new fancap for umo on um2 hotend. I might be able to pull a perfect robot at 50mm/s. Ofc ruby nozzle it's simple amazing.
70mm/s 210C olsson nozzle 0.1 layer (same gcode as the first post video)
Using my new fancap for umo on um2 hotend. I might be able to pull a perfect robot at 50mm/s. Ofc ruby nozzle it's simple amazing.
- Neotko
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: February 7th, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Location: Madrid
- 3D Printer(s): UMO+ x2.5
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Awesoooooomeeeee!!!! 38minutes print time.
Btw this is using red (slightly transparent) very very cheap from benq.
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Finally had time to mount the ruby nozzle to my UM2Go, because I am using my UMO's with a 0.8 nozzle for bigger prints these days.
And there is a noticeable difference!
Printing in rPET the material is much more translucent compared to the brass nozzle and I could print cooler.....
Because of the material presets in the UM2Go I sometimes forget to change the material before, so the PET starts with the 210 degrees preset. With the brass nozzle the print would be white and start to suffer from the low temp, but the ruby nozzle would finish the print translucent with no problem..
Dialing to temp to 220 works great of coarse and the print had a more cleaner outside with less 'blobs' then before.
And there is a noticeable difference!
Printing in rPET the material is much more translucent compared to the brass nozzle and I could print cooler.....
Because of the material presets in the UM2Go I sometimes forget to change the material before, so the PET starts with the 210 degrees preset. With the brass nozzle the print would be white and start to suffer from the low temp, but the ruby nozzle would finish the print translucent with no problem..
Dialing to temp to 220 works great of coarse and the print had a more cleaner outside with less 'blobs' then before.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 415
- Joined: February 8th, 2016, 8:37 pm
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
- 3D Printer(s): UM2 UM2E, UM2Go, UM3, Delta Tower, Form 1+, Form 2
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Sorry everyone for not posting here lately, I have been very busy with family matters, I will try to catch up a bit coming days.
Recommended tightening torque for the ruby nozzle is 0.25-0.5 Nm (use the torque wrench)
3 Nm is actually difficult to achieve unless you use a properly large wrench-. If you are using a small nozzle spanner and tighten the nozzle gently you should not risk destroying it.
That was one reason for starting this forum actually, since a large part of the advanced community appears to have ditched the official UMforum after the upgrade.
Regarding the feeding, I think you are also seeing effects of thermal conductivity that I hope to fix on the next batch.
I might have observed this effect myself too now when I think about it, but I just was not aware of that the ruby might affect the transparency of the print.
Regarding this incident, we concluded that the main reason was way too high tightening torque (3Nm) in combination with the UMO heater block design. I can only blame myself though as the instructions were a bit unclear in an earlier post, which I have now edited.Amedee wrote:Ooops...
_D7A9956.jpg
Recommended tightening torque for the ruby nozzle is 0.25-0.5 Nm (use the torque wrench)
3 Nm is actually difficult to achieve unless you use a properly large wrench-. If you are using a small nozzle spanner and tighten the nozzle gently you should not risk destroying it.
The thermal conductivity of the nozzles will vary a bit, I am working on fixing that for the next batch, but thanks for the feedback!danilius wrote:The one interesting thing is that I had to bump the hot end temperature up from 255C to 270C to get it to print without the extruder kicking back.
I did a post about it on the (new) UMforum long time ago but there was basically zero response.Titus wrote:Actually, Anders, the Ruby nozzle, is that still partly a secret on UMforums? I haven't really read anything about it there, and I was about to post a picture, which I ended up not doing, just in case.
That was one reason for starting this forum actually, since a large part of the advanced community appears to have ditched the official UMforum after the upgrade.
Regarding the feeding, I think you are also seeing effects of thermal conductivity that I hope to fix on the next batch.
Thank you for the feedback, that is very interesting results indeed!PeggyB wrote:Finally had time to mount the ruby nozzle to my UM2Go, because I am using my UMO's with a 0.8 nozzle for bigger prints these days.
And there is a noticeable difference!
Printing in rPET the material is much more translucent compared to the brass nozzle and I could print cooler.....
Because of the material presets in the UM2Go I sometimes forget to change the material before, so the PET starts with the 210 degrees preset. With the brass nozzle the print would be white and start to suffer from the low temp, but the ruby nozzle would finish the print translucent with no problem..
Dialing to temp to 220 works great of coarse and the print had a more cleaner outside with less 'blobs' then before.
I might have observed this effect myself too now when I think about it, but I just was not aware of that the ruby might affect the transparency of the print.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 122
- Joined: April 21st, 2016, 5:29 pm
- Location: Salford, United Kingdom
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker 2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
I feel a bit bad having not posted my recent experiences with the ruby nozzle. First of all, I only printed one small test of carbon fibre filament with some unknown stuff, nothing to report there basically. It printed, boring result. Was only a small test cube anyway.
Also, I seem to be getting to grips with the nozzle and with PETG it looks like I can stay at around 240C - 250C and still get good results. PETG is anyway proving to be a bit of a pain, my earlier prints were far simpler than I am attempting now, and so the ruby nozzle actually helps in narrowing down setting for a better surface.
All in all, for regular printing the ruby nozzle produces "sharper" prints in that the nozzle geometry helps to highlight problems with the print, but the ruby surface itself does not seem to be more or less sticky than brass for any material I have tried so far, so for regular printing does not provide any particular benefits or real disadvantages.
On the cool factor side, it of course can't be beaten
Also, I seem to be getting to grips with the nozzle and with PETG it looks like I can stay at around 240C - 250C and still get good results. PETG is anyway proving to be a bit of a pain, my earlier prints were far simpler than I am attempting now, and so the ruby nozzle actually helps in narrowing down setting for a better surface.
All in all, for regular printing the ruby nozzle produces "sharper" prints in that the nozzle geometry helps to highlight problems with the print, but the ruby surface itself does not seem to be more or less sticky than brass for any material I have tried so far, so for regular printing does not provide any particular benefits or real disadvantages.
On the cool factor side, it of course can't be beaten
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 122
- Joined: April 21st, 2016, 5:29 pm
- Location: Salford, United Kingdom
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker 2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
What I think you will find is the ruby version has much more air in the layers, which means that you have lower interlayer adhesion. The air refracts the light which makes the print shinier, which is a nice effect, but mechanically poorer.PeggyB wrote:Finally had time to mount the ruby nozzle to my UM2Go, because I am using my UMO's with a 0.8 nozzle for bigger prints these days.
And there is a noticeable difference!
Printing in rPET the material is much more translucent compared to the brass nozzle and I could print cooler.....
Because of the material presets in the UM2Go I sometimes forget to change the material before, so the PET starts with the 210 degrees preset. With the brass nozzle the print would be white and start to suffer from the low temp, but the ruby nozzle would finish the print translucent with no problem..
Dialing to temp to 220 works great of coarse and the print had a more cleaner outside with less 'blobs' then before.
2016-05-23 09.02.59.jpg
2016-05-23 09.05.06.jpg
- LePaul
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3970
- Joined: February 7th, 2016, 10:26 pm
- Location: Bangor, Maine USA
- 3D Printer(s): 24 - Yes I have a problem!
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
More air? Please explain...that's interesting
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 122
- Joined: April 21st, 2016, 5:29 pm
- Location: Salford, United Kingdom
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker 2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
I have printed several kilos of PETG with the gorgeous ruby nozzle as well as standard 0.4mm nozzles, and with a 0.8mm nozzle. After faffing around a lot with various temps and speeds, I discovered by watching the nozzle when printing that if uneven - essentially underextruded - lines were drawn, such as after a long retract, when the next lines were drawn over them they looked quite different than layers with better adhesion, i.e. properly drawn lines.LePaul wrote:More air? Please explain...that's interesting
So I set things up to exaggerate the problem, such as using the new coasting feature, and this appears to confirm my theory. The refractive properties of PETG exaggerate this effect, but it can be seen in hot nylon (such as Taulman Bridge) as well. Air of course has quite a different refractive index than PETG. So when you trap it inside the plastic, you get that silvery sheen effect. PETG has an incredible property in that when you have your lines being drawn very flat on top, i.e. well squished down, the layers fuse into a solid. I think it's because PETG retains heat far longer than other more common plastics. So when the next line gets drawn, the layer below fuses really well.
Having smashed quite a few pieces in the name of.....OK, it was fun....I discovered that the broken pieces had shattered as if they had been injected. The broken surface did not look like it was printed out of layers. There were no layers to be seen. It's quite bizarre, but probably something that contributes towards the incredible strength of PETG.
- Dim3nsioneer
- Reactions:
- Posts: 221
- Joined: February 19th, 2016, 2:13 pm
- Location: Zurich Area, Switzerland
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker Original, 2, 2+, 2 Ext+, 3, S5, Form 2
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Btw: Is there or has someone tested a ruby nozzle with an opening larger than 0.4mm? IIrc Woodfill is also quite abrasive and I print it with a 0.8mm nozzle...
- LePaul
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3970
- Joined: February 7th, 2016, 10:26 pm
- Location: Bangor, Maine USA
- 3D Printer(s): 24 - Yes I have a problem!
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
A ruby toothpaste nozzle would be neat to see!
- Meduza
- Reactions:
- Posts: 289
- Joined: February 10th, 2016, 8:08 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- 3D Printer(s): UM2+, UM3 (F2, UM2EX+ UM3EX, etc at work)
- Contact:
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
I belive there is none so far, since the ruby manufacturers have quite high minimum orders and long lead times the focus is on getting everything working really well in 0.4 before progressing to anything else.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 122
- Joined: April 21st, 2016, 5:29 pm
- Location: Salford, United Kingdom
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker 2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Currently I am printing various prototypes with a 1.0mm nozzle, and it's incredible to see how fast that goes. Oh, and they are interlocking and fully functional prototypes just in case you were wondering. With some careful planning printing with a 1.0mm nozzle is really a fantastic way to print large parts and still get a respectable surface finish. Ruby toothpaste nozzle, yay!
- martin-bienz
- Reactions:
- Posts: 172
- Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 2:42 am
- Location: Switzerland
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker Original, prusa i3 mk2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
I have now printed 4 roles (125m Diamond Age) of PLA (and a few NinjaFlex prints). The Ruby still holds perfectly well, no visible issues. All great (top surface could be better). No special filaments so far...
- martin-bienz
- Reactions:
- Posts: 172
- Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 2:42 am
- Location: Switzerland
- 3D Printer(s): Ultimaker Original, prusa i3 mk2
Re: Super hard nozzles - Test pilots
Question, how is the oozing with the 1mm nozzle? I am still to test it and I have now an application . Can you please upload a picture of the finish? Can you also say something with regards to tolerances etc, do I need more? Thanks!danilius wrote:Currently I am printing various prototypes with a 1.0mm nozzle, and it's incredible to see how fast that goes. Oh, and they are interlocking and fully functional prototypes just in case you were wondering. With some careful planning printing with a 1.0mm nozzle is really a fantastic way to print large parts and still get a respectable surface finish. Ruby toothpaste nozzle, yay!