3D Printing Forum

Yep, I tried it.
https://ultimaker.com/en/community/3735 ... x-hardcore

Neo, interesting stuff. I do think you should add a bit more explanation to the YM post. Basically the changing nozzle will be clear for everyone, but the reduction of core movement (and ringing) on an empty core, like you claim, will not be very clear. Also, very obvious, reducing this on a single ...

Think in this case the market will totally depend on the speed at which Ultimaker will bring out various core sizes, and ofc a ruby core. So with UM's current development speed there could very well be a market for some time :) but realistically if there are alternative UM cores the market for this ...

I'm late to the party, I know... too many different places to track already.... but it got interesting in here

Just in case someone wants to try the concept, and risk ruining two print cores, I have four spare blocks at home Anders. I like to try. I already have two extra cores in stock... I feel brave enough to risk them (think you have it but I'll PM you my email) Do these new blocks use the standard nozzl...

Brass?? I mean is the setup with the screw into the plastic parts ofor the core good enough to prevent damage to the heatbreak... the superthin part.... or is it replaced by a thicker part?

neotko, really wonder how much torque you can put on the nozzle before breaking the heatbreak? you don't need to clamp the block when changing a nozzle right? just the screw is enough?